Charles Leblanc's Other Blog: Randy McKeen views on my Battle with the Fredericton Gestapo Police Force!!!

hits counter

Site Meter

CAN GOOD EVER DEFEAT EVIL AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE???

good

BLOGGER ASSAULTED BY TWO SECURITY QUEBECOIS AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE!!!

New Painting of Fascist Tyrant Quebecois Sergeant-at-Arms of the New Brunswick Legislature Dan Bussieres located in the Leg!!!

dan4

Darn shame a person cannot go back in time eh????

IMGP5615

bottom_line

Click on the link ---- Randy McKeen says Blogger's lawyer premature in calling for provincial inquiry!!

Monday, January 23, 2012

Randy McKeen views on my Battle with the Fredericton Gestapo Police Force!!!

http://www.khj.ca/thebottomline/Story.aspx?ID=1642638

14 comments:

Anonymous said...: Excellent piece by McKeen.; 11:51 AM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: McKeen has hit the nail on the head, i agree, great piece.; 1:47 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: Randy is a lot like mikel - they both ride the fence when talking about Charles LeBlanc.; 2:46 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: Randy has done a good job here, but so did Jordan from city hall.... Too bad city hall didn't have more say about what the city police will and will not do. Where is the Mayor on this matter. I didn't see the Mayor needing 8 or more police officers around when Charles went to visit him at his office.; 3:04 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: Charles,

I just finished reading all of the articles both written and audio / video. I've been watching you for years and you and I have spoken on a few occasions. I always said you were on the edge and could get under peoples skin, but that this was acceptable because of the valued stories that you have brought to lite over the years. However, unless you are swinging with both hands you are not supposed to be able to get under the skin of a police officer. I should know, I was a police officer for a very very long time.

Bye the way, I know your arch nemeses ..."Dan Bussier"... He quit the RCMP because he couldn't take it. He was a sickly thing from Quebec and when he couldn't get his way, he jumped into a decent job at the legislature. I gave him koodoos at the time, but the only thing is, he brought his sickly, whining behaviour with him. He has used his position and abused his authority to push you around. It's easy to do when he doesn't really have a boss and he just orders people around "willie nillie" which certainly includes the Fredericton City Police.

It would appear to me that everyone from the city police that have taken a shot or two at you have previously been involved in the legislature issues, which have all been influenced by the Sergeant at Arms Dan Bussier. "Dan" you should be ashamed of yourself, but I know you're not. I understand that it was you that reported Charles for riding on the sidewalk and no helmet and you were able to influence the city police into giving him the $140 fine....."Give me a Break"..... I'm glad you left the RCMP...That is sad...

"Getting back to the City Police", They should know better as well, but they don't. Weak minded police officers do weak minded things. Giving Charles traffic violations wasn't good enough!!!!... Charles fights back verbally so you charge him criminally for "libel".... a section of the criminal code that has been proven to be ineffective and as well non constitutional... Have we completely lost it "Boys"

Now, you have city councillors speaking out. Well it's about time actually, although they are asking the wrong question of the wrong person. They should be asking for the Chief of Police to step down, immediately. He has allowed his police force to attack the rights given to all Canadians. "The Right to Speak out and be Heard"

Everyone in the know, and especially the police know that Charles Leblanc is not a violent man. He is known as a pain in the rear or the neck. For the FPF to send a large number of officers to his small apartment to seize his computer was in and by itself unreasonable. What foolish Crown Lawyer authorized this foolishness or did they just go straight to a JP. I hope they did just go to a Justice of the Peace, because maybe the DOJ can clean this up before it goes any further.

What truly offends me in this matter, is that the police took all of Charles' computer equipment. Regardless of the quality of the investigation or charge, the only thing the police needed in this investigation was the computer/and or hard drive. For them to take all of his equipment including his monitor, keyboard and mouse was just plain spiteful and purely ignorant of the officers. They know better and this was just another attempt to silence Charles, and to deprive him of his lawful property, ect., which is not the right of the police to do.

I don't just think the officers involved here have been mischievious in their childish ways, I actually believe that they are bordering on "Criminal Mischief"

I am not as elequant as Jordan Graham, "but by God", I agree with him.; 3:08 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: Charles, I've been your biggest critic... I've called you out many times for the "racist" and "fascist" labels (and still think you were/are dead wrong to use such labels).

However, I disagree with what the FPF is doing here. I'm not at all surprised that this has happened, because you brought it on yourself.. but I am definitely saddened by it.

Shame on the Fredericton Police Force. I'm glad to see two high profile Fredericton personalities take a stand on this matter.; 4:50 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: http://justiceinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com/2012/01/silencing-frederictons-gadfly.html; 5:00 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: To 3:08. The retired police officer

You were a police officer ? ummm. Well I dont know what you did as a Police officer but you should know (specially if you were a police officer) that there are 2 sides to every stories. In here, you are stating an opinion based on one side...You should know better my friend... Remember the Luc Begin matter, this soldier who claimed he was beat up? And many other things. People right away blamed the police to the fullest, based on parts of a video. But then when all the facts came to light in court hoooo Now we learned the other side...That the guy lied, that he had a knife concealed on him while fighting with police, that he faked being un-concious in the cells...This was seen on video..That he said he was out of the city the night of the incident when in fact Police had a video with him inside the Irock that night etc. and etc...And the cop was found not guilty...

My friend..enjoy your retirement cause we dont need police man like you anywhere ...; 5:17 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: @ 3:08, you sure said a lot. But I noticed you left one thing out......your name. Hmmmmmm, I wonder why? And by the way, NB doesn't have Justices of the Peace. You should have known that since you were a cop for so many years.

CJ; 7:19 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: I enjoy the irony of 3:08 that he/she goes on to libel Dan.; 7:26 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: Since when does the police arrest people while they are just collecting information on an investigation?; 7:30 PM, January 23, 2012
Anonymous said...: The sidewalks are full of cyclists in fredericton with all ages not wearing a helmet and the FPF have to single this old man out and charge him, to which he pled guilty.With all the crime in F'ton FPF might solve approx 40% only with assistance from public. FPF can usually be reached at 1-800-doughnut [tim hortons].; 8:29 PM, January 23, 2012
Bovine Excrement Detector said...: To anon 5:17..

You are so very wrong on one point. There are in fact 3 sides to every story. In this case there's Charles' side, the FPD's side and then there's the truth...somewhere in the middle.; 9:57 PM, January 23, 2012
The Dude said...: Randy does raise some excellent points about this and has caused me to reevaluate somewhat.

While publicly calling someone racist and fascist, without conclusive proof, is defamation of character.

What got me though is when Randy suggested would the same thing happen if not a police offer made me pause and reflect.

I think that he is right. They would tell us to get a lawyer and sue.

I think the police chose this route because they know that seeking monetary compensation is a waste of time.

If Charles had a ton of dough I would suspect that it would have been a civil charge.

The police will probably lose on these grounds which is good for Charles but I still suspect that a consequence of this action will result in Charles having to remove all defaming content and refrain from doing it again.

I don't think that this will go to trial. I think it will be a plea bargain.; 2:08 PM, January 24, 2012

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)