CAN GOOD EVER DEFEAT EVIL AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE???
good
BLOGGER ASSAULTED BY TWO SECURITY QUEBECOIS AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE!!!

New Painting of Fascist Tyrant Quebecois Sergeant-at-Arms of the New Brunswick Legislature Dan Bussieres located in the Leg!!!
dan4
Darn shame a person cannot go back in time eh????
IMGP5615 bottom_line Click on the link ---- Randy McKeen says Blogger's lawyer premature in calling for provincial inquiry!!
millionHits

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

A message to my Dear Idiots Coward Jerkfaces???

If you feel strongly about an issue or defame someone?

Meet with me face to face and I'll take your pic and name to go with your coward views on this Blog.

My God? If I'm in a good mood?

I'll do a video!!!

Email me at oldmaison@yahoo.com for a meeting...

But unfortunately Idiotd Cowards Jerkfaces don't meet in public.....

:P..:P..:P

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Charles,

I'm just glad to see you are up and running from your home today. Being deprived of your civil liberties is tuff to deal with, but I think you did a fine job of reorganizing. You have some good friends... You also have some tuff critics... Don't let them get to you...
This is not mine, but it is a quote I feel I lived by and you have somehow endorsed it as well. Quote:"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." (A Leader)

Best of Luck..... I got your email last night. You are welcome and I said "Hi" to madame for you.

The Fisherman

Anonymous said...

Charles was not deprived of any civil liberties. The victims of his libel have been, though, for months now.

Anonymous said...

@2:14 coward jerk face

Eric said...

@2:14. The "victims of his libel" Oh yeah, because due to Charles's words, Mr Police Man couldn't perform his duties, and lost sleep over it. I'm sure.

It all boiled down to, "Mommy, he said some mean things about me."

If the "victim" in question can prove that anything Charles said has had a detrimental effect on his life, work, etc, then fine. But if the police stand by their notion that Charles is just a "crackpot who spouts his opinions" (in a manner of speaking.) Then they have nothing.

If that were the case, I could be sued for slander when I say that driver who almost hit me is a complete moron.

Anonymous said...

298. (1) A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it is published.

Anonymous said...

It doesn't seem that there has to be any proof of damage, but proof that damage was 'likely' to result from the libel.
That's just how I read it, though.

Cannon said...

YES!!! I am absolutely willing and wanting to have a conversation with you on camera. I have been waiting for the opportunity...with one simple rule... the ENTIRE interview is shown on your blog... no editing on your part...can you agree?