IS THIS CITIZEN RIGHT ABOUT BLOGGER BEING ARRESTED AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE???
IMGP6077
BLOGGER ASSAULTED BY TWO SECURITY QUEBECOIS AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE!!!

New Painting of Fascist Tyrant Quebecois Sergeant-at-Arms of the New Brunswick Legislature Dan Bussieres located in the Leg!!!
dan4
Darn shame a person cannot go back in time eh????
IMGP5615 bottom_line Click on the link ---- Randy McKeen says Blogger's lawyer premature in calling for provincial inquiry!!
CBC INFORMATION MORNING HOST TERRY SEGUIN FIRST QUESTION TO NEW ELECTED FREDERICTON COUNCILLORS WAS THEIR VIEWS ON THE ARREST OF BLOGGER CHARLES LEBLANC BY THE FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE???

CITIZENS FROM FREDERICTON ARE STILL ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE!!!
IMGP5387
Lawyer Steven Foulds and New Brunswick Blogger Charles LeBlanc face Media in Fredericton
lawyer,jpgIMGP6398
Blogger finally finds a few friends to chat with about his problems!!!
IMGP6591
CTV covers media scrum by Blogger and Lawyer!!!!

CBC covers media scrum by Blogger and Lawyer!!!

Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight is interviewed by CBC Host Terry Seguin about Blogger Charles LeBlanc!!!

CBC Journalist Jacques Poitras interviews Blogger in his home!!!!

Fredericton Information Morning host Terry Seguin questioned Woodside and Hayes about Blogger Charles LeBlanc case???

Media are demanding questions from the Fredericton Police Force!!!

Sheetal Rawal from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association views on Blogger Charles LeBlanc case!!!

Criminologist Michael Boudreau and Law Professor Jula Hughes gives their views on Blogger's case
millionHits

Sunday, February 07, 2010

Fascist Saint John Police Force in action!!!

The scary part of this video is the way the undercover cop came in and took my camera and deleted all 200 pictures from my camera.

Destroying the evidence is a form of policing in Saint John.

I might add they have the support of the R.C.M.P. in New Brunswick.

Scary stuff!!!!

Click below for video -




26 comments:

Anonymous said...

The new deal they have now, is if you plead not guilty on a speeding charge, they will up the charge to more miles over the speed zone and charge you court costs. This is what you call New Brunswick democracy! grahams law.

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:30 is lying.

Anonymous said...

How about recinding all your contracts with canada and the province and travel freely as your charter rights say so!

Anonymous said...

Thier not Facist,Thier just plain Rotten Lying b,er Scoundrels.
They are so used to getting away with this shoddy work and its become routine,Thanks Charles for shedding a little bit of light!

RooPeeDoo said...

@5:42 I love playing that game with the cops. One stopped me at a road block not too long ago and asked "Do you have a license, registration, and insurance?"

I said "yes" and just sat there and smiled at him. He never said another word...I assume he was waiting for me to produce them. He never asked me to show them to him, he just asked if I had them.

This awkward moment seemed to last for a minute but it was probably seconds...and then he waved me through.

People are shocked at me when I tell this story but fact of the matter is they can not force you to show this documentation. You have to volunteer it. When they are called on it they buckle because they know that they are dealing with someone who knows how the law really works.

Also you do not need a license to drive, insurance, or registration.

You do have a right to travel freely. I defy anyone on here to quote a law that says you need a drivers license, registration, or insurance.

There is no law that forces you to hold all of this documentation. You are born free but volunteer into contracts of slavery.

And you thought you knew how the world worked!

RooPeeDoo living free since 1981!

PS Diganet is your friend!

RooPeeDoo said...

@11:30

Why would you plead at all? When you pleaded you entered into a contract. Never use a lawyer and always present yourself before the courts.

Notice I said present yourself, not represent yourself. If you present yourself you can not be held in dishonour and you have not entered into a contract. If you represent yourself then you have entered into a contract and subject to the whims of a judge.

When presenting yourself do not volunteer any information, including your name.

Jesse said...

@RooPeeDoo

So doing this at roadblocks really works? I am pumped to try this! Do you know of any websites or other places where I can find information and resources on my actual rights, and not the ones they tell you! Like say if a police officer wants to search my car, what are my rights there? I have seen videos from the states on these kind of issues but I have no idea if those rights and laws are the same here.. Thanks!

Jesse said...

and another thing! If you get stopped by the police say walking around town, and they asked to see ID, do you have to give it to them, can you say "Am I free to leave?" and then walk away?

What can you do if you were caught smoking a joint by one of them, and you threw it away before they got there?

RooPeeDoo said...

@ Jesse

http://www.natural-person.ca/index.html

Do not try any of this until you know it inside out. Just one minor screw up and you are done like dinner.

Don't run off all giddy like thinking you know this. This is serious stuff and not to be treated lightly.

RooPeeDoo said...

See how a pro handles this. Do you have the balls Jesse?

RooPeeDoo said...

Everything Is Ok

Anonymous said...

This story was told to me by a grandfather of a great high school hockey player, at the York Arena tournament, and the incident occurred at the exit of the Perth Andover bridge, to the highway, where many residents had to donate to the graham slushy fund by entrapment in a 70 year old speed zone policy, taking advantage of the modern method of not crawling at 30 kilometers up a modern road. The forced spread of french is wrought with stupidity.

Magos said...

I'm totally psyched by all this. I've been search for years for the kind of information that would let me leave society and never has to use that dirty Canadian health care system ever again. Damn province paying for my visits, it's not right.

Luckily because of this information I can never go bankrupt when I don't pay my doctor since MAGOS is just some corporation and not simply the capitalization my name. Get out of court free, WOOOOO!

This should also come in handy when I hit parked cars, and I do that a lot It really infringes on my right to travel when I have to wait for the other person so we can exchange insurance information. Screw em and their busted radiator. It's their fault anyway since they insist on infringing upon my FSM given rights.

The only downside is that this only applies to common law, and that I'm screwed whenever I enter any country whose justice system is based on the Napoleonic code, or Sha'ria law.

Jesse said...

Thanks for the links! I really enjoyed the videos and did quite a bit of reading on the website.. which led me to some links on how 9/11 was an inside job, now don't get me wrong, I don't know what really happened and we probably never will but when all that paranoid tin-foil-hat stuff starts flying around then I know I've stepped too far into the bullshit zone.

That being said there's always some truth to the things they say.. Just like there's always 'some'(some) truth to what the government says..

My main problem isn't with drivers licenses, Social insurance numbers or passports.. it's these ideologues in power who impose their morality on others as if it was what's best for them.. abortion, recreational drugs, same-sex marriage etc..

Every drug should be legalized, and it doesn't mean I'd shoot crack in my eyeballs.. It wouldn't happen, it's bad for me, but it's still my choice..

I guess the government and police must think they're pretty clever.. without drug laws to tell the people whats best for them, why the world would turn to utter chaos wouldn't it? Were too stupid to know what's best for our bodies.. or that's the way they make it seem..

Dan F said...

"which led me to some links on how 9/11 was an inside job, now don't get me wrong, I don't know what really happened and we probably never will"

No?

We found out recently that Vietnam was started with an outright lie. We also know that the Nazis likely used false-flag terrorism to shut down dissent and opposing parties prior to the horror of WWII.

An explanation for the total breakdown of North American air defense, spontaneous implosions of skyscrapers untouched by planes and the still hidden pentagon video surveillance tapes are but a few of the obvious missing pieces of the official 9/11 narrative.

If Americans do not eventually find some truth about the onset of the terror wars, the political schizophrenia afflicting their nation since at least JFK's killing will only continue to spread.

Magos said...

The 9/11 truth movement, the belief that the planes hitting the buildings and the buildings coming down were simply a coincidence.

Dan F said...

Magos,

If that kind of simplified, twisted argument were enough to keep people in the dark, we wouldn't see the massive numbers of truthers flowing out of the woodwork.

For your information, although your tone suggests you're about as receptive as Shawn Graham to nonconforming data, no plane hit tower 7 (or the pentagon, for that matter) - and yet it came crashing down at free fall speed.

If the official version of events were true (Tower 7 free-fall implosion due to office fires), we should have seen the total elimination of the controlled demolition industry as well as a radical shift in building codes and weight tolerances for high-rise buildings. We haven't.

That nobody except the victims and now-dying first responders have suffered the consequences of all the supposed mistakes leading up to 9/11 (i.e. designing and building huge office towers that will explode when a plane hits them or a small fire starts inside) is a bit odd, wouldn't you say?

The commanding officers of the air defense groups that let 3 out of 4 jumbo jets hit their targets got promoted shortly after - this is pretty weird too, I'd say.

No stranger I guess than the guy who leased the WTC months before the attack getting a double insurance payout for the buildings but then refusing to rebuild.

Ask the Pakistanis now being bombed by US drones who they think did 9/11 - I'll bet the Saudi patsies we've been proffered are pretty low on their list.

Magos said...

So the pentagon was never hit by a plane, but 3 jumbo jets of 4 hit their targets.

I can totally get why you'd want it to be the government with it's massive resources that did this awful event. It's pretty scary to think that 19 hijackers with little resources against an incompetent and possibly negligent government intelligence apparatus could have pulled off one of the deadliest attacks on US soil.

Sure Bush & co. made out like bandits with the carte blanche the attacks gave them but all I see are armchair engineers inventing ways they could have done it, some which defy logic, not evidence that they did.

Dan F said...

"So the pentagon was never hit by a plane, but 3 jumbo jets of 4 hit their targets."

Yeah - it gets tricky when all you've got are lies on one side and mostly questions and supposition on the other. The evidence I've seen suggest the pentagon was hit by a missile.

As to how many planes went where, with all the simulated highjackings being run under 'Vigilant Guardian' that day, your guess is as good as mine.

"not evidence that they did"

Have you seen the tower 7 clips?

Seeing with your own eyes is considered tin foil to some people these days.

Sheesh

Dan F said...

Also, though the connection to fascist St. John police has long left the conversation, your argument:

"I can totally get why you'd want it to be the government with it's massive resources that did this awful event."

Is pretty tin foil if you ask me.

You're saying that I'd rather the government I was paying tax to at the time ritually slaughter me and fellow citizens so they could go to war & discard our rights than worry about some Saudi Al-Qaeda operatives getting lucky with their box cutters?

Although I weep for the state of what is considered manliness and patriotism in the NAU, I really don't think I've been that castrated.

Fear of these alleged Jihadis (molded into anger) is certainly what was used to justify the subsequent slaughter perpetrated on the middle east.

Jesse said...

You're totally right on using fear as an excuse for the violence and slaughter in the middle east, no question there! The government/media loves using fear and they always have..

News headlines such as
(Things in your house that could kill you!) (Meth Laced Marijuana that kills!)( Killer Flu Virus! Everybody Hide and Go Crazy!)

People are strange man, I refuse to believe half the crap they tell us on the 'news'.. what ever happened to swine flu anyways? It's like someone tries to bomb a plane in Detroit and all of the sudden the flu is gone and we should be worried about body scanners in airports.. what a joke..

Magos said...

The missile hypothesis is the most preposterous idea in the whole movement. I'd even buy it was an inside job before I'd buy that the pentagon was hit with a missile.

I don't think there is anything alleged about the hijackers, someone had to fly the planes into the building.

Dan F said...

Magos,

If you really care about this, I suggest you do some more research.

The highjackers, who were by all accounts awful pilots, were not needed to fly the planes anywhere:

There are automatic guidance systems that can be installed, over-riding by remote control the manual pilot controls.

The maneuver of the 'plane' heading into the pentagon has been described as impossible by commercial pilots of the same airframes. That these alleged jihadis bothered to twist all the way around to hit one very specific section of the pentagon seems strange, considering their supposed motives.

Besides, the only evidence we've seen that the 19 Saudis were on the planes at all are the phone calls made to relatives by passengers via magic cell phones and a magic passport that survived the crash in New York.

I guess when you consider the wacky details that are ignored in other crimes involving the state (i.e. JFK's magic bullet) - it is not so hard to see how easily we can be fooled.

Magos said...

So..

I'm supposed to believe that 3 planes hit their targets but that one was a missile despite witnesses and physical evidence of a plane. Four planes were destroyed that day, I guess one of them is in the Bermuda triangle (probably chillin' with the Irvings)

Also I guess I'm supposed to believe what my eyes tell me, otherwise that'd be tinfoil, but am supposed to swallow things like nano-thermite and remote control planes, which isn't tin foil.

Do I have that right?

If you do buy this, which I doubt, I have some land in Naria to sell that's just recently thawed.

Anonymous said...

Silverstien takes out massive insurance policy on twin towers months before! War games going on that very same day ! 4 airliners way off course no response and very big delay in getting fighters up to escort Airliners?
Towers 1 and 2 hit with manuvers that Seasoned Pilots say couldnt be done under Manual Control Done by a few guys who could hardly fly a Single Engine Cessna?
Building 7 Not hit by anything was told it was going to collapse 1/2 hour ahead by emergency personel,1 hour ahead by BBC news?
This is supposed to lead us to Bin Laden or was it used to invade Afghanistan,then Iraq??

The list goes on and on! What a lie!
But it is easier not to think about and just believe what your fed through the Media I suppose?

Governments Lie and People Die!

Jesse said...

Being so sure that it was an inside job because the media and government are 'out to get us' is just as close-minded as those who refuse to question what happened due to blind patriotism.. two awful extremes..